Shocking Scandal: 7 Explosive Claims Against Rippling Co-Founder That Will Leave You Speechless!

Prasanna Sankar, co-founder of the $13 billion HR tech firm Rippling, is facing serious allegations from his estranged wife, Dhivya Sashidhar, amid a contentious divorce and custody battle. In an emotional interview, Dhivya accused him of coercing her into an open marriage, hiring escorts, and emotionally abusing her during and after childbirth. She also claimed he moved their family between countries to avoid taxes and spied on her through hidden cameras.

Prasanna, in response, denied the allegations and accused Dhivya of infidelity, sharing hotel bookings and personal messages to back his claims. He alleged that she had an affair with a man named Anoop and filed false legal cases against him, including child abduction. Prasanna said he is now evading local authorities due to these accusations. Both are currently fighting a legal battle over the custody of their 9-year-old son. The case has drawn public attention for its complexity, emotional weight, and conflicting narratives from both parties.

Shocking Scandal: 7 Explosive Claims Against Rippling Co-Founder That Will Leave You Speechless!

The bitter divorce and custody battle between Dhivya Sashidhar and Prasanna Sankar, co-founder of the tech company Rippling, has escalated into a public scandal, with both parties hurling serious accusations at each other. The case, now making international headlines, reveals a tumultuous relationship marked by claims of coercion, infidelity, and legal manipulation.

Dhivya’s Allegations: Open Marriage Pressure and Control

In a recent interview with The San Francisco Standard, Dhivya Sashidhar, Prasanna’s estranged wife, shared disturbing details about their marriage. She accused him of repeatedly pressuring her into agreeing to an open marriage—a demand she says began shortly after the birth of their son. According to Dhivya, Prasanna allegedly threatened to seek intimacy outside their relationship if she refused to comply, even while she was physically recovering from childbirth. She referenced a December 2019 email in which Prasanna supposedly laid out his desire for an open marriage. Though he later apologized, Dhivya claims the emotional pressure and manipulation continued.

Beyond the marital strife, Dhivya accused Prasanna of using their family’s frequent international relocations—from India to the U.S. and Singapore—as a tactic to evade taxes on his growing wealth. She also alleged he installed hidden cameras in their home to monitor her movements and insisted she take extended leave from her job to prioritize his demands. “I felt trapped, both emotionally and physically,” Dhivya stated, describing years of what she called controlling and abusive behavior.

Prasanna’s Defense: Denials and Counterclaims

Prasanna Sankar has vehemently denied all allegations. Through a series of social media posts, he acknowledged that their marriage had become “sexless” but argued that the open marriage discussion arose during a moment of frustration—not as a sustained campaign of coercion. He accused Dhivya of distorting the truth to gain sympathy in their custody battle.

In a striking counterattack, Prasanna alleged that Dhivya had a six-month affair with a man named Anoop, which he discovered after being contacted by Anoop’s wife. To support his claims, he shared screenshots of hotel bookings and messages allegedly exchanged between Dhivya and Anoop. “She portrayed herself as a victim, but there’s another side to this story,” Prasanna wrote, insisting her infidelity contributed to the breakdown of their marriage.

Legal Battles and Criminal Accusations

The conflict has spilled into the courts, with both parties filing serious legal complaints. Dhivya has accused Prasanna of rape and child abduction—charges he dismisses as “fabricated.” Prasanna claims these allegations forced him into hiding in Tamil Nadu, India, to avoid what he calls “unlawful police action.” Meanwhile, Dhivya maintains that her legal actions are a response to genuine threats to her and their son’s safety.

Custody Fight: Competing Narratives

At the heart of the dispute is the custody of their 9-year-old son. Dhivya portrays herself as a protective mother fighting to shield her child from a toxic environment, while Prasanna argues that she is leveraging their son to tarnish his reputation. Family courts in multiple countries are now tasked with untangling these conflicting accounts to determine the child’s future.

Public Reaction and Broader Implications

The case has ignited debates about power dynamics in high-profile divorces, particularly those involving tech executives. Supporters of Dhivya highlight the vulnerability of spouses in unequal relationships, while Prasanna’s allies warn against rushing to judgment without evidence. The use of social media to air grievances has further complicated the situation, blurring the lines between personal disputes and public spectacle.

What’s Next?

As legal proceedings unfold, both parties face an uphill battle to prove their claims. Dhivya’s allegations of coercion and surveillance, if substantiated, could have serious repercussions for Prasanna’s career and public image. Conversely, evidence of her alleged affair and misuse of legal systems might undermine her credibility.

For now, the case serves as a stark reminder of how personal conflicts can escalate into legal and media wars—especially when wealth, reputation, and custody are at stake. Observers await court rulings to bring clarity—and hopefully, resolution—to this deeply fractured family saga.